以证据为基础、以同行评审为核心、以工程价值为导向Evidence-based, peer-reviewed, and guided by engineering value
HETEA 恒创工程技术卓越奖的评审不以固定名额为目标，而以成果质量、工程证据和行业价值作为最终依据。评审工作围绕真实工程问题、可靠验证、应用效果、合规性和可推广价值展开，力求让每一项推荐结论都有清晰的证据链和可追溯的评审记录。The HETEA Hengchuang Engineering Technology Excellence Award is not driven by fixed quotas. Its final basis is the quality of achievements, engineering evidence, and industry value. The review focuses on real engineering problems, reliable verification, application effects, compliance, and transferable value, so that every recommendation is supported by a clear evidence chain and traceable review records.
HETEA坚持以下基本原则，任何类别均适用。HETEA follows the following principles across all award categories.
申报成果应具备可核验的项目记录、测试报告、验收证明、专利论文、第三方评价或应用证明。Submitted achievements should be supported by verifiable project records, test reports, acceptance documents, patents, papers, third-party evaluations, or proof of application.
申报材料由相关工程子领域专家独立评审，跨学科成果应匹配不同子领域专家共同判断。Application materials are independently reviewed by experts in relevant engineering subfields. Interdisciplinary achievements should be assessed by experts from different subfields.
评审专家须遵守利益冲突回避制度，评审判断不应受个人关系、商业关系或其他利益因素影响。Review experts must comply with the conflict-of-interest recusal system, and their judgments should not be affected by personal, commercial, or other interest-related factors.
未达到推荐标准的奖项类别可以空缺。奖项质量优先于数量安排。An award category may remain vacant if no candidate meets the recommendation standard. Award quality takes priority over quantity.
以下为HETEA年度评审的基准维度。不同奖项类别可在年度评审细则中进行适度权重调整，但不得削弱证据、合规和工程价值要求。The following are the baseline dimensions for HETEA annual review. Weighting may be moderately adjusted for different award categories in annual review rules, but evidence, compliance, and engineering value requirements must not be weakened.
| 评审维度Dimension | 基准权重Baseline Weight | 重点考察内容Main Review Focus |
|---|---|---|
| 工程问题真实性与难度Authenticity and Difficulty of the Engineering Problem | 20% | 问题是否来自真实工程场景，是否具有明确的技术难度、约束条件和解决价值。Whether the problem comes from an actual engineering scenario and involves clear technical difficulty, constraints, and value for resolution. |
| 工程创新性与技术突破Engineering Innovation and Technical Breakthrough | 20% | 是否形成新工艺、新材料、新工法、新设备、新系统或新的工程组织方法，并相对既有方案有实质进步。Whether the achievement forms new processes, materials, methods, equipment, systems, or engineering organization methods, and whether it represents substantive progress over existing solutions. |
| 证据完整性与验证可靠性Completeness of Evidence and Reliability of Verification | 20% | 是否提供完整、可核验、可追溯的工程记录、检测数据、验收材料、第三方报告或公开成果。Whether complete, verifiable, and traceable engineering records, test data, acceptance materials, third-party reports, or public outputs are provided. |
| 实际应用效果Practical Application Effect | 15% | 是否在工程质量、安全、效率、成本、可靠性、运维或环境影响方面产生可说明的实际效果。Whether the achievement produces demonstrable effects in engineering quality, safety, efficiency, cost, reliability, operation and maintenance, or environmental impact. |
| 行业贡献与可推广性Industry Contribution and Transferability | 15% | 是否对工程行业方法、标准、产业升级、跨领域协作或人才培养形成积极影响。Whether the achievement positively affects engineering methods, standards, industrial upgrading, cross-field collaboration, or talent development. |
| 合规、安全与可持续价值Compliance, Safety, and Sustainable Value | 10% | 是否符合知识产权、学术规范、工程安全、数据真实性和相关监管要求，并具备长期工程价值。Whether the achievement complies with intellectual property, academic standards, engineering safety, data authenticity, and relevant regulatory requirements, and whether it has long-term engineering value. |
评分结果是形成推荐意见的重要依据，但不等同于自动获奖。若某项成果存在重大证据缺口、合规风险或工程安全争议，即使个别维度评分较高，也不得进入最终推荐名单。Scoring results are an important basis for forming recommendations, but they do not automatically determine an award. If an achievement has major evidence gaps, compliance risks, or engineering safety disputes, it must not enter the final recommendation list even if it scores highly in certain dimensions.
评审职责与HETRA现有组织架构保持一致。Review responsibilities are aligned with HETRA's existing organizational structure.
负责申报受理、材料完整性审查、流程通知、材料流转、评审记录整理与档案留存。Responsible for application acceptance, completeness review, process notices, material circulation, review record organization, and archive retention.
按工程子领域组织技术初审，每份进入技术初审的材料原则上由不少于3名相关专家独立评审。Organizes technical preliminary review by engineering subfield. In principle, each application entering technical review is independently assessed by no fewer than three relevant experts.
负责成果原创性、数据真实性、学术规范、引用合规及相关风险的独立审核。Responsible for independent review of originality, data authenticity, academic standards, citation compliance, and related risks.
依据评审记录、推荐意见和合规审核结论，对最终获奖名单进行审议确认。Deliberates and confirms the final awardee list based on review records, recommendations, and compliance review conclusions.
HETEA年度评审通常按以下六个步骤推进。HETEA annual review normally proceeds through the following six steps.
专家与申报人存在亲属、近3年合作、师生、雇佣、顾问、投资或其他可能影响客观判断关系的，应主动回避。Experts must recuse themselves when family, collaboration within the past three years, teacher-student, employment, consulting, investment, or other relationships may affect objective judgment.
技术初审阶段实行独立评分和书面意见提交，评审意见在汇总前不得相互影响。During technical preliminary review, experts submit independent scores and written comments, and review opinions should not influence one another before consolidation.
申报材料、形式审查记录、评分表、专家意见、会议纪要和审议结论按档案制度留存。Application materials, formal review records, score sheets, expert comments, meeting minutes, and deliberation conclusions are retained under the archive system.
在不影响工程事实核验的前提下，技术初审材料可对部分身份信息作必要处理，减少非技术因素干扰。Where it does not affect verification of engineering facts, certain identity information in technical review materials may be handled as necessary to reduce non-technical interference.
公示期内，任何个人或机构可通过 contact@thehetra.com 提出实名异议，并提交可核验的事实依据。协会在收到异议后10个工作日内组织核查。涉及工程技术判断的，由HETEC安排未参与原评审的专家复核；涉及学术规范或数据真实性的，由学术委员会复核；核查结果由常务理事会最终裁定。During the public notice period, any individual or institution may submit a real-name objection through contact@thehetra.com with verifiable factual basis. The Association will organize verification within ten working days after receiving the objection. Matters involving engineering judgment are reviewed by HETEC experts who did not participate in the original review; matters involving academic standards or data authenticity are reviewed by the Academic Committee. The final decision is made by the Standing Council.
获奖者如被发现存在学术不端、数据造假、工程安全违规、知识产权侵权、虚假申报或其他严重违规行为，协会有权撤销其奖项、追回证书与奖杯，并在必要范围内发布撤销公告。撤销决定应由常务理事会审议通过，并保留相关核查记录。If an awardee is found to have engaged in academic misconduct, data falsification, engineering safety violations, intellectual property infringement, false application, or other serious violations, the Association has the right to revoke the award, recover certificates and trophies, and publish a revocation notice within the necessary scope. The revocation decision should be reviewed and approved by the Standing Council, with relevant verification records retained.
本页面为HETEA评审机制的公开说明。年度申报通知、材料清单、具体日期和补充要求以当年度正式发布的申报指南和协会动态为准。This page is a public description of the HETEA review mechanism. Annual application notices, material lists, specific dates, and supplementary requirements are subject to the formal application guide and Association Updates issued for the relevant year.